If an identification question has an accepted answer, it would make sense to tag it with the authors name. Or should we not tag it and leave it as a sort of trivia question for others?
|
No, I don't think so. Not all story identification questions are resolved unambiguously, and sometimes the asker misremembered details. If you know the name of the author already, the question is often not interesting. The tags on a question are tags that searchers might use. By definition, someone searching for an identification question does not know the name of the author. To retag the question would be counter-productive. I would encourage using tags that reflect what themes the asker remembers, e.g. What is the title of a story about a elevator through time and the smallest possible change → time-travel obviously, and parallel-universe (I'm not sure about that one — I put it in because it involves changing the timeline, but I can see the case against). |
|||||||
|
|
I'm going to say that yes, providing that the answer is clearly proved to be the correct one (by an answer being accepted, for example). If there is any doubt, the the author's name should be excluded, until all doubt is removed. |
|||||||||
|
|
I'll say Yes, because it would help in ordering the information after the question has been answered, as Dima pointed out. Also, it might be an interesting metric later for figuring out what author has the least memorable titles. |
|||
|
|
|
It's a nice idea, but where there isn't a tag in place for the author remember that (it seems to me that) quite a few of the story-identification questions are raised by first-time or relatively new visitors who may not have or indeed ever gain the rep required to create a new tag. |
|||
|
|
|
Current standard practice or not, yes, I'd like to see this happen. My argument for is that if I subscribe to an author's tag, it's because I am interested in seeing discussion about the author and their works. I'd like to know what others are saying about them, what is sticking out to other readers (what one person remembers might be different from what I remembered; what struck them powerfully might be different from my own interaction with the work). I'm following an author tag because I am a fan, and even though an answer might be accepted, if I am a knowledgeable fan of that author, I might be able to contribute to the question/answer through comments or provide an even better answer :) |
|||
|
|