Old review tool contradicts itself regarding the number of “first questions”

Question

The Phantom Menace:

phantom post

I have to add some garble garble garble text here, because the site doesn't allow me to post the question, otherwise. Ignore this text here.

Mine shows the following question scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/22414/…
As does mine... Though now that I look at it, it also tells me 48 posts under first answers on the main "review" screen, but then zero when I click the link.
For me, on the list of review lists, it shows 48 First Answers, 1 First Question, and 41 Late Answers. After clicking through, all of them show 1 post in both the header and the list. (The one showing up on both First Answer/Late Answer happened after @NominSim posted)

Anna Lear · Accepted Answer · 2012-09-05 21:46:09Z

up vote 1 down vote accepted

One way this can happen is if you have ignored tags.

Beyond that... I don't have much other than "huh, that's weird."

Since we're now pouring efforts into the new /review and these old queues will eventually be replaced, this is probably not worth fixing.

answered Sep 5 '12 at 21:46

Anna Lear♦
527212

	I do. One of them (harry-potter) is tremendously popular, so that's probably the reason. – bitmask Sep 5 '12 at 21:49
	@bitmask I'm gonna go with [status-bydesign] then. :) – Anna Lear♦ Sep 5 '12 at 21:50

1 Answer